Skip to content
WAYNE LAW REVIEW

WAYNE LAW REVIEW

  • About
  • Archive
  • Symposium
  • Staff
  • Order
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Transfer Student Journal Applications
  • The Bulletin
WAYNE LAW REVIEW
WAYNE LAW REVIEW
Volume 56 No. 2

Two Cheers for the Appointment System

April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

John B. Wefing

56 Wayne L. Rev. 583

56WayneLRev583

Download PDF

Post Tags: #Judiciary

Post navigation

Previous Previous
The Voters’ View on Judicial Merit Selection
NextContinue
The North Carolina Experience

Similar Posts

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Judicial Performance Evaluation

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Rebecca Kourlis

    Read More Judicial Performance EvaluationContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Your Account Balance is Due-Pay Up or Get Out: Streamlining The Eviction Process In Michigan

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Mary Jo Weindorf

    Read More Your Account Balance is Due-Pay Up or Get Out: Streamlining The Eviction Process In MichiganContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Judicial Selection: A View from the Outside

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    John V. Orth

    Read More Judicial Selection: A View from the OutsideContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    The Indiana Experience

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Daryl Yost

    Read More The Indiana ExperienceContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    The Voters’ View on Judicial Merit Selection

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Seth S. Anderson

    Read More The Voters’ View on Judicial Merit SelectionContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Options for an Independent Judiciary in Michigan: Foreword

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Sandra Day O’Connor

    Read More Options for an Independent Judiciary in Michigan: ForewordContinue

© 2026 WAYNE LAW REVIEW - WordPress Theme by Kadence WP

  • About
  • Archive
  • Symposium
  • Staff
  • Order
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Transfer Student Journal Applications
  • The Bulletin