Skip to content
WAYNE LAW REVIEW

WAYNE LAW REVIEW

  • About
  • News
  • Archive
  • Symposium
  • Staff
  • Order
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Transfer Student Journal Applications
  • The Bulletin
WAYNE LAW REVIEW
WAYNE LAW REVIEW
Volume 56 No. 2

The North Carolina Experience

April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

Jesse Rutledge

56 Wayne L. Rev. 579

56WayneLRev757

Download PDF

Post Tags: #Judiciary

Post navigation

Previous Previous
Two Cheers for the Appointment System
NextContinue
The Indiana Experience

Similar Posts

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Judicial Selection: A View from the Outside

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    John V. Orth

    Read More Judicial Selection: A View from the OutsideContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Options for an Independent Judiciary in Michigan: Foreword

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Sandra Day O’Connor

    Read More Options for an Independent Judiciary in Michigan: ForewordContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Contemporary Supreme Court Election Campaigns Undermine Public Trust in Courts

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Rich Robinson

    Read More Contemporary Supreme Court Election Campaigns Undermine Public Trust in CourtsContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 3

    The Personal Price of Justice

    ByAdministrator December 1, 2011July 6, 2025

    John W. Lindstrom

    Read More The Personal Price of JusticeContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    Judicial Performance Evaluation

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Rebecca Kourlis

    Read More Judicial Performance EvaluationContinue

  • Volume 56 No. 2

    The Voters’ View on Judicial Merit Selection

    ByAdministrator April 1, 2011July 7, 2025

    Seth S. Anderson

    Read More The Voters’ View on Judicial Merit SelectionContinue

© 2026 WAYNE LAW REVIEW - WordPress Theme by Kadence WP

  • About
  • News
  • Archive
  • Symposium
  • Staff
  • Order
  • Contact
  • Submissions
  • Transfer Student Journal Applications
  • The Bulletin