Autonomy and Isomorphism: The Unfulfilled Promise of Structural Autonomy in American State Constitutions

In the American system of federalism, states have almost complete freedom to adopt institutions and practices of internal self-governance that they find best-suited to the needs and preferences of their citizens. Nevertheless, states have not availed themselves of these opportunities: the structural provisions of state constitutions tend to converge strongly with one another and with the U.S. Constitution. This paper examines two important periods of such convergence: the period from 1776 through the first few decades of the nineteenth century, when states were inventing institutions of democratic governance and representation; and the period following the Supreme Court’s one person, one vote decisions in the early 1960s, when the Court’s destruction of the existing constitutional model created an important opportunity for states to experiment with alternative forms of legislative representation. In the first period, initial innovation and diversity were followed quickly by convergence and isomorphism; and in the second period, no burst of innovation occurred at all. After reviewing studies of institutional isomorphism and policy diffusion from other fields, the paper concludes that the facts best fit explanations based on the resort by constitutional drafters to well-known patterns of non-rational decision-making such as “availability” and “anchoring” heuristics. American state constitutions thus likely display little diversity in their structural provisions not because prevailing models have proven superior to the alternatives, but because imitating the choices of seemingly similar entities is a common way to dispatch cognitively challenging tasks. Read More …

Explaining State Constitutional Change

The U.S. Constitution mandates that each state have “a republican form of government” and empowers the federal government to enforce this requirement. It also asserts its supremacy and that of other federal law, including statutes and treaties, over state constitutions, as well as over other state laws. Yet these requirements and restrictions are not particularly burdensome, and if one compares the “constitutional space” available to state constitution-makers in the United States with that available to their counterparts in other federations, there are far greater opportunities for constitutional innovation and experimentation in the United States than in most other federations. Read More …

Michigan State Constitutionalism: On the Front of the Last Wave

The evolution of American state constitutions has been, in part, the product of “waves” of state constitutional adoption and revision. These waves have reflected national or regional political developments that have had causes and impacts beyond a single state. There were two waves of state constitution-making during the “founding decade” of 1776 to 1787. The first of these waves was a radically egalitarian form of state constitution-making (such as Pennsylvania) that stimulated a second-wave reaction, resulting in more moderate, or balanced, state constitutions (such as Massachusetts). Read More …

A Wave of Change: Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of Michigan’s Constitution and the Evolution of State Constitutionalism

The  Symposium  will  be  held  on  Friday,  October  11th  at  Wayne   State  University  Law  School  from  8:00am  to  5:00pm. RSVPs  are  not  required  but  encouraged.  To  RSVP,  please  click  here. This  year’s  symposium  is  triggered  by  the  50th  anniversary  of  Michigan’s Constitution.     Ratified  in  1963,  Michigan’s  Constitution  was  part  of  a  wave  of change  in Read More …

Restoring Detroit One Historic House at a Time: A New Look at Old Historic Preservation Laws

In light of Mayor Young’s quote, although Detroit’s population is plummeting, hope is not lost even in the face of staggering statistics. According to the latest census data, Detroit lost twenty-five percent of its residents in ten years. Former residents left behind approximately 80,000 vacant single-family homes. Although there is no study of how many of these homes are salvageable, Detroit’s well-built, brick historic homes were built to last in contrast to inexpensive post-World War II housing and offer a much-needed opportunity for reinvestment and growth in Detroit. Read More …

The Battered Partner’s Paradox: A Case for Beckley and Wilson Redux

A case study of Oakland County, Michigan murder trials from 1986 to 1988 revealed that courts were not only unsympathetic to women who suffered domestic abuse and acted in self-defense but tended to sentence them more harshly. According to the study, domestic abuse victims were convicted more often and received longer sentences than all others who faced homicide charges, including defendants who already had violent criminal records. Read More …

Revision of Michigan’s Sand Dune Protection and Management Act Benefits Private Interests at the Expense of Local Zoning Regulations

Coastal sand dunes are one of Michigan’s most treasured and unique resources. The dune sand itself is useful in foundries and manufacturing, and property within a coastal dune area is valuable for development and recreation. The dunes are also an ecosystem housing many species of plants, birds, and other wildlife. In 1994, Michigan enacted legislation to protect its extensive coastal dunes through a comprehensive statute centered on a land use permitting system. The statute also included provisions for regular environmental studies monitoring the condition of the sand dune ecosystem. Further, it established a model zoning plan, although local units of government were able to enact ordinances providing at least the same degree of protection to the critical dunes as the model zoning plan. The amended statute still allows local units of government to enact zoning ordinances, but only those providing “substantially equivalent” protection to the critical dunes as the model zoning plan will be approved. Thus, the state effectively determines both the floor and ceiling for regulation. Read More …