mega888{"id":747,"date":"2011-12-01T13:33:16","date_gmt":"2011-12-01T18:33:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/?p=747"},"modified":"2012-08-20T17:15:54","modified_gmt":"2012-08-20T21:15:54","slug":"constitutional-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/constitutional-law\/","title":{"rendered":"Constitutional Law"},"content":{"rendered":"

Download<\/a><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Major trends and themes during the Survey period for constitutional law involved: (1) the general lack of independent Michigan constitutional law when a federal constitutional counterpart exists; (2) limited development of independent Michigan constitutional law in which a federal constitutional counterpart exists, most notably involving the protection against cruel or unusual punishment and certain zoning cases; (3) the broadening of the right to confrontation in connection with inadmissibility of certain hearsay statements at criminal trials; (4) clarification of the right against self-incrimination; (5) limiting criminal defendants\u2019 post-conviction procedural rights; (6) refusal to expansively interpret the right to counsel; (7) clarification of the prohibition against double jeopardy in connection with charging and sentencing defendants; (8) strengthening the free exercise of religion; (9) development of issue preservation and the plain error standard of review; and (10) clarification of the applicability of the Headlee Amendment to revenue raising measures by municipalities. <a href=\"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/constitutional-law\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">→<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[143,112],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/747"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=747"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/747\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1405,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/747\/revisions\/1405"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=747"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=747"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=747"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}