mega888{"id":745,"date":"2011-12-01T13:33:16","date_gmt":"2011-12-01T18:33:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/?p=745"},"modified":"2012-05-20T17:34:32","modified_gmt":"2012-05-20T21:34:32","slug":"civil-procedure-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/civil-procedure-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Civil Procedure"},"content":{"rendered":"

Download<\/a><\/iframe><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michigan Courts issued a number of noteworthy Civil Procedure cases during the current Survey period. For example, the Michigan Supreme Court announced a new and more stringent standard applicable to motions for class certification. The Michigan Court of Appeals also set forth a new method for analyzing motions for summary disposition on the basis of governmental immunity. In addition, two cases from the Survey period demonstrate that Michigan courts have departed from the strict application of the statutory procedural requirements in medical malpractice actions. Noteworthy cases from the current Survey period are described in greater detail below. <a href=\"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/civil-procedure-2\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">→<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[120],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/745"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=745"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/745\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1191,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/745\/revisions\/1191"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}