mega888{"id":310,"date":"2010-12-10T19:44:48","date_gmt":"2010-12-11T00:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/?p=310"},"modified":"2012-05-20T16:26:58","modified_gmt":"2012-05-20T20:26:58","slug":"torts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/torts\/","title":{"rendered":"Torts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Download<\/a><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\/\/ <![CDATA[\n(function() { var scribd = document.createElement(\"script\"); scribd.type = \"text\/javascript\"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = \"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/javascripts\/embed_code\/inject.js\"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName(\"script\")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })();\n\/\/ ]]><\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This Survey found that narrow interpretations of words and phrases are the vehicle our appellate courts use to engage in outcome determinative decisions. In many cases, the motivation is to remove a case from the docket instead of striving to allow a plaintiff her day in court with a jury. Analyses of cases involving premises liability, medical malpractice, and governmental immunity demonstrate anti-individual bias in favor of corporate, insurance, and government interests. <a href=\"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/torts\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">→<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126],"tags":[135],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1175,"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions\/1175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/waynelawreview.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}